The time when Radionics came to be – and a fairly good explanation befitting those times

Let's explore now some history of this method, radionics, which for more than a century has been proven to be a useful method of action upon the environment, including action at a distance, as we perceive distance with the set of our senses, which is interacting with a perceived environment, based on electromagnetic frequencies. 
As such, radionics is one of many useful methods known to us:  a thing that many of the gurus of traditional radionics do not exactly like to admit.  This method has been established first more than a century ago by a physician with the name of Abrams.  His discovery was one of many coincidental discoveries, and he interpreted his way, based on knowledge available during his times.  These assumptions and resulting technologies eventually led to radionic methods as they are used in our days.  These mappings, as he established them, may be considered "wrong" according to our more advanced knowledge, and yet, to him they explained very well what happened and they led to new useful methods of interacting with the environment. 

I claim to have developed a better, and more useful mapping of what we call radionics, and at the same time I am well aware this my mapping, or theory, is just one of the many potential useful mappings, and, for the sake of progress, this, my theory, hopefully will become obsolete in due time – the sooner the better - just the same way as Abram's theories and the many other theories, or mappings, which have been formulated by people after Abrams, became obsolete.

Abrams

Again, my new approach became necessary because the assumptions and attempts to explain radionics and why it works became antiquated and pretty much useless, plain and simple, especially in the light of my invention of the chi generator and a resulting better understanding of the common functional principles of the methods of all life-energy based actions at a distance as we know them.  Most of the theories of radionics never led to new development in recent times, some of them were quite "neat" as far as being "in tune" with some pop-scientific views of how the universe is supposed to be structured.  These approaches simply have proven to be insufficient, i.e., they held back a lot of potential of the radionics approach, they actually blocked the evolution of new technologies, and there was hardly ever any mention how radionics related to other AAD - my new approach takes care of this, and I prefer the approach talking about abstractions made permanent.

As far as the effect itself, I mean, for the person using a device, the theory leading to the technology is pretty much irrelevant, and already traditional radionics had the advantage of enormous flexibility, which with the new approach of power radionics could be increased significantly, of course.

Talking about “radionics frequencies,” let's start now with Abrams:  Abrams may have had the wrong assumptions, but, based on such assumptions, which in our days seem wrong, he developed a new approach to actions at a distance. 

"Sometimes wrong assumptions can lead to new technologies" (Edward de Bono, lateral thinking) A good example is Marconi, who succeeded as a first with a radio wave connection across the Atlantic, assuming that the radio waves follow the surface of the Earth.  Had those “top scientists” known about straight propagation of waves and found out about Marconis’ experiment, they may have tried to stop any financial support for such “idiocies,” likely they would have succeeded, and it may have taken a few years till some “coincidence” may have led to the results.   And then, in some respect, Marconi’s assumption was correct, although not when seen in relation to the radio waves proper, but how those waves interact with the stratosphere, which reflects them, provided the wavelength is right.

Abrams, who was a MD, at first tapped the belly of his clients to find out about their problems.  He heard different sounds on different people and different diseases, and since back then everything was “frequency” just as in our days there is much talk about “quantum” and “nanotechnology,” he had the brilliant idea – or “crackpottish idea” to use a rheostat, which was a large and relatively simple device to define a resistance, similar to a potentiometer in our times, and resistance was used back then to determine the wavelength of radio waves that are to be broadcast or to tune into specific wave lengths that are broadcast from somewhere else. 

What Power Radionics™ can do for you - Specifics

The following applications of this extraordinary new technology are based on personal experiences of many proud owners of Chi Generators®, power radionics™ devices and power radionics™ programs.